‘The nation which first learns to plot the paths of air masses accurately and learns to control the time and place of precipitation will dominate the globe.’
General George C. Kenney, Commander of the US Strategic Air Command, in the 1940s. Project Cirrus, the first explicit, military rainmaking effort in the West soon followed.
IT’S TEMPTING to steer clear of the unpleasant, the controversial, or the deeply uncomfortable. But truth and integrity often live in those difficult places we’d rather avoid.
Tackling unsavoury questions isn’t about seeking conflict or promoting pessimism; it’s about facing reality with honesty and courage.
Avoiding hard topics doesn’t make them disappear—it only gives them power in the shadows.
Introduction
ON A CRISP, clear morning you look up and see long, white streaks cutting across the sky—contrails, we’re told.
But wait … should condensation trails linger, spread, and blanket the sky in a ghostly haze?
At a time when the UK grapples with historical weather extremes and crop devastation – all of it blamed on ‘Climate Change’ – could this be more than simple condensation?
Contrails vs. Con-trails
CONTRAILS FORM when hot aircraft exhaust meets sub-zero air, freezing into ice particles. This is a well-known reality.
Typically short-lived, these can linger under specific humidity and temperature conditions. We’re aware of this, too.
However, many observers have long noted distinct peculiarities in trail behaviour—abnormally thick, persistent trails that expand unnaturally, merging into milky films that blanket our skies.
Weather Modification: A Reality
Cloud seeding is not conspiracy—it’s established, well-documented science.
Techniques using silver iodide, dry ice, or potassium iodide are routinely deployed to provoke rain or disperse fog. Programs exist across the U.S., UAE, China … and here in the UK.
Yet while generally considered ‘safe’, long-term health impacts from prolonged and widespread aerosol exposure remain understudied.
China’s 2008 Olympic Weather Engineering
In 2008, Beijing’s Weather Modification Office, an organisation with 37,000 personnel, used rockets and silver iodide flares to suppress rain minutes before the opening ceremony—claiming triumph in controlling the skies.
(Left) ‘Weather changers’ began firing rockets from a battery of artillery into the clouds above Beijing four hours before the opening ceremony and continued firing until 11.40pm, shortly before the finale.
This was a large-scale, public weather-manipulation operation that worked—and it raises a vital question: if major governments achieved this overtly seventeen years ago, could more advanced, secret programs be flying under our radar today?
UK’s Agricultural Crisis: War on Farmers?
(Left) Cambridge, 2004
(Right) Pontypridd following storm Bert, 2024
(Left) Northamptonshire, 2024
THE UK HAS faced seismic weather shifts:
- The wettest 18 months since 1836, triggering floods that destroyed vegetable and fruit crops—4.9% drop in veg, 12% in fruit yields.
- 2024 saw the third-worst arable harvest since 1984, with wheat yields down ~20% and oilseed rape suffering a 32% fall.
- Farmers lost approximately £1.19 billion in arable income following extreme wet winters.
- Spring 2025 recorded the hottest and driest in 50+ years, leaving crops dangerously stressed.
This volatility poses a stark question:
Are these unusual weather events merely climate-driven—or are they connected to aerial interventions that directly affect farming?
Sun-Dimming & Military Expertise at the Met Office
THE UK, via ARIA, spurred funding (~£57 million) into Solar Radiation Management (SRM) research, testing aerosol injection into the stratosphere and marine cloud brightening.
Critics have branded such efforts ‘barking‑mad,’ warning that untested geoengineering could have unintended—and potentially catastrophic—effects.
I now draw your attention, once again to the assertion made by a high-ranking military officer on the subject of weather warfare (top).
Compellingly, the UK Met Office’s Chief Executive, Penny Endersby, comes not from a meteorological background, but from defence technology. With expertise in armour, explosives, and cyber & information systems at DSTL (Porton Down), she is uniquely placed in both defence and environmental modelling.
Her credentials include:
- Former armour and explosives specialist at DSTL (Porton Down)
- Director of Cyber & Information Systems
- Acting Chief Technical Officer for defence science
Her dual expertise in weapon‑grade science and large‑scale environmental systems may raise eyebrows among those wary of militarised weather control.
Ensuing questions about the possible militarisation of our weather are therefore fully justified.
Didn’t it Rain
DECLASSIFIED RECORDS show that from 1949 to 1955, the Royal Air Force (RAF) released various substances, including dry ice, silver iodide, and salt into the atmosphere at high altitudes in order to induce rain.
‘The clouds would then precipitate, pulled down below freezing point by the extra weight of dense particles, thus making it rain sooner and heavier than it might
have done …’John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, ‘RAF rainmakers ‘caused 1952
flood,’ Guardian, 30 August 2001
Using chemicals supplied by ICI, ‘international scientists’ were involved in the experiments, including specialists from the Cranfield College of Aeronautics and the RAF’s meteorological research base at Farnborough.
Perhaps the most significant aspect of the programme was that the weather weaponisation experiments continued after they had produced the worst recorded flood in British history, the Lynmouth disaster of 1952.
‘We flew straight through the top of the cloud, poured dry ice down into the cloud. We flew down to see if any rain came out of the cloud. And it did about 30 minutes later, and we all cheered.’
Group Captain John Hart, RAF, 1952
‘I was told that the rain had been the heaviest for several years – and all out of a sky which looked summery … there was no disguising the fact that the seedsman had said he’d make it rain, and he did. Toasts were drunk to meteorology and it was not until the BBC news bulletin [about Lynmouth] was read later on, that a stony silence fell on the company.’
Aeronautical Engineer, Alan Yates, on the subject of a successful cloud seeding event over Middlesex, in which a heavy downpour was created over Staines, 1952
A Potential Agenda Against Farming?
LET’S ALIGN the facts:
| What we Know | What it Could Suggest |
| Persistent trails in the sky | Possible aerosol injections beyond contrails |
| Secret or semi-public SRM programs | Capability to alter precipitation patterns |
| Severe crop failures & economic losses | Agricultural systems under engineered stress |
| Defence‑tech leader at Met Office | Expertise in weapon systems & weather modelling |
These factors, taken together, suggest that it’s not unreasonable to ask:
Could aerial spraying be purposely influencing British weather in ways that hamper farming?
While there is no clear causal link between UK floods and shifts in global politics, it is interesting to note that recent UK flooding events have often aligned with periods of heightened political instability or transition:
| Flood Period (UK) | Flood Scale / Impact | Global Political Context |
|---|---|---|
| Autumn 2000 | Wettest autumn since records; huge UK flooding shows first signs of climatic extremes | Globalisation rising; pre‑9/11 era; liberal order strong |
| June–July 2007 | One of worst summers; £6.5 bn damage, 13 deaths | Pre‑financial crash; stable global order; early populist stirrings |
| Dec 2015 (Storm Desmond) | Record rainfall; ~3,500 properties flooded; major infrastructure damage | Paris Agreement; rise of populism (Brexit, Trump); refugee crises |
| Nov 2019–Feb 2020 | Wettest winter; record February; fatalities and widespread property loss | Pandemic onset; nationalism & de‑globalisation trends; climate urgency |
| 2022 (Storm Franklin & others) | Multi‑wave flooding; emergency events in Scotland & South West | Russia–Ukraine war; energy/inflation crisis; rising climate diplomacy stress |
Questions Worth Asking
- Will the Met Office publish full data on all SRM or aerosol tests?
- Are health impact assessments of any atmospheric dispersants in place?
- Have farmers seen correlations between spray events and yield drops?
- Is public consent being obtained for climate‑scale weather experiments?
Conclusion: Clarity, Not Conspiracy
THIS BLOG ISN’T making definitive claims about a hidden weather warfare agenda – however compelling the preponderance of evidence may be. Such assertions are immediately and furiously ‘debunked’ by the global media apparatus, in their desperate bid to maintain a fixed narrative.
Through their efforts, fevered counterclaims by so-called ‘fact-checkers’ are issued in spite of the mountain of official evidence of weather manipulation activities freely available in the public domain.
The aim of this blog has been nothing more than to present information in the hope that it prompts thought, and perhaps debate. Because, in an environment where contrails linger oddly, harvests collapse, and our own national weather authority is run by a former weapons expert … it’s fair to demand answers.
Final Thoughts
RELUCTANCE TO consider unsavoury truths often stems from a desire to preserve comfort or long-held beliefs. It’s true, confronting uncomfortable realities can threaten our sense of control or morality, prompting denial or avoidance. Yet, in shielding ourselves from these truths, we risk at best, self deception – at worst, complicity.
Tyranny thrives not only through force but through the silence and inaction of an uninformed populace, turning ignorance into both a shield for the corrupt and a weapon against freedom.
RAVEN MOON 